PlantingSeeds.ca + SocialMediaMonitoring.ca
links for 2008-08-26
links for 2008-08-23
links for 2008-08-22
links for 2008-08-15
links for 2008-06-30
fuckyourogers.com
Social Media for Government Conference
links for 2008-06-11
Consistency across departments
 
September 2008
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006


 
 

QAD: Advertisers want to know - 2

Transmission Content + Created Question A DayAs part of my first ??Question A Day? series, I??m giving my thoughts to some questions Kris Hoet has pointed to. He’s asking the the community to answer eight FAQs advertisers have about social media and online marketing.

Yesterday??s QAD can be found here.

Here??s today??s question:

Does online advertising make sense without a decent website?

If your website is a detriment to closing the deal, then don??t advertise. And that stands whether you??re trying to close the deal online or off.

Think of your website as your retail location or office space, many of the same rules apply. If your site isn??t welcoming, organized, clean, or well designed, ultimately, you??re not taking the necessary steps to move your customers along the purchase cycle. You??re not leaving them with a positive impression.

In addition, if you??re selling your product online and it??s difficult to navigate along to your checkout area, then pushing people to your site doesn??t make sense either. Essentially, it all boils down to the visitor??s experience. So let??s rephrase the question:

Does online advertising make sense without a website that creates a positive experience?

It??s like that old advertising adage: Nothing kills a bad product faster than great advertising. Well, today, nothing kills online sales faster than a website that creates a negative experience. Strive for the most positive experience, just as you would offline, and you can go a long way to making your online advertising efforts pay off.

Of course, the questions then becomes: just how are you planning to advertise online? Because interruption tactics ?? pop-ups, banners, etc. ?? are just as ineffective online as they are off. But that’s topic for another day.

Other questions:

Back on Monday with Question 3.

5 Responses to “QAD: Advertisers want to know - 2”

  1. Philippe Says:

    I disagree on this one.

    I believe that you can be efficient online with a good pre-click experience:
    http://badideaindeed.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/69/

  2. Mark Says:

    I like the research you point to, Phillippe. Two excellent reads in there. I also agree with the angle you’ve taken on this question.

    But I still stand by my first point: “If your website is a detriment to closing the deal, then don??t advertise.”

    I look at the question from the perspective of the site being tied to the online advertising component, essential to closing the deal.

    Your response is an excellent rebuttal to my last point: “just how are you planning to advertise online? Because interruption tactics ?? pop-ups, banners, etc. ?? are just as ineffective online as they are off. But that??s topic for another day.”

    While I’m still would never advocate an interruption-based campaign, the numbers you point to certainly do provide food for thought.

  3. Philippe Says:

    and then comes the (very difficult) question: what’s a good website? :)

    I was surprised to read a report about what (belgian) people expect from a food brand website. The expectations are pretty simple: price, composition, how to use to product and where to find it… this can hold in one single page.

    Of course, simplicity is probably one of the pillars of the positive experience you evoke.

  4. Mario Vellandi Says:

    Design the site with a simple site structure and don’t have too much copy. Additionally, make sure any hurdles such as registration steps and total clicks in a particular process, are kept to a minimum. Usability is paramount; graphics and multimedia are secondary considerations.

  5. Mark Says:

    Totally agree with Mario on this one. Simplicity is the key.

    Don’t make me think. http://www.sensible.com/buythebook.html

Leave a Reply

 
 
 
 
ACCAbuzz
English Cut
Kansas Family Law Blog
Lincoln Sign Company
Stonyfield Farm
 
Bad Idea, Indeed
BlogWriteforCEOs
Business 2.0
Church of the Customer
Converstations
David Armano
Gaping Void
Guy Kawasaki
Living Light Bulbs
Malcolm Gladwell
Mark Cuban
MarketingProfs
MIT Advertising Lab
My 2 Cents
Robert Scoble
Springwise
Techno/Marketer
WOMMA
 
Unleashing the Idea Virus
The Cluetrain Manifesto
The Tipping Point
Life After The 30" Spot
Purple Cow
The Big Moo
Naked Conversations
Remembering the Montreal Expos
Age of Conversation
 
Robin Hood Marketing
The Art of the Start
Do It Wrong Quickly
Wikinomics
Age of Conversation
 
Citizen Marketers
Creating Customer Evangelists
The 22 immutable laws of mktg
The Corporate Blogging Book
The New Rules of Marketing + PR
 
CK
Valeria Maltoni
Nedra Weinreich
Mack Collier
Kris Hoet
Gavin Heaton
Tim McHale
Stephen Denny
Jason Moore
Tim Jackson
Nathan Snell
Tammy Strnatka
Jane Lindsey
Bob Glaza
Drew McLellan
Mario Vellandi
Paul McEnany
Kathy Smith
Cam Beck
Jeremy Shearer
Lewis Green
Winnie Anderson
Steve Woodruff
Laura Ries
Claudiu Florea
Doug Hudiburg
Chip + Dan Heath
Ann Handley
Scot Quaranda
Hazel Wagner
C. B. Whittemore
Muskie McKay
Bill Gammell
Gaynelle Grover
Victor Cook
Jay Hamilton-Roth
Steve Akler
David Berkowitz
Krista Goon
Mansing Bhor