PlantingSeeds.ca + SocialMediaMonitoring.ca
links for 2008-08-26
links for 2008-08-23
links for 2008-08-22
links for 2008-08-15
links for 2008-06-30
fuckyourogers.com
Social Media for Government Conference
links for 2008-06-11
Consistency across departments
 
September 2008
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006


 
 

QAD: Advertisers want to know - 4

Transmission Content + Created Question A Day

Hitting the halfway mark in the first Question A Day series. Todayâ??s question, once again in response to Kris Hoetâ??s request. These questions, by the way, originated at Bad Idea, Indeed. Kudos to Philippe for putting these together based on experience with his clients.

How can impressions be compared to television GRPs?

Iâ??m not sure they can, because while they seem to be the same thing, they arenâ??t.

First, letâ??s define a GRP (from Wikipedia):

â??GRP (short for Gross Rating Point) is the sum of ratings achieved by a specific media vehicle or schedule. It represents the percentage of the target audience reached by an advertisement. If the advertisement appears more than once, the GRP figure represents the sum of each individual GRP. In the case of a TV advertisement that is aired 5 times reaching 50% of the target audience, it would have 250 GRP = 5 x 50% — ie, GRPs = % reach x frequency.â?

Now, letâ??s call a GRP what it really is: a crapshoot. Youâ??re not buying anything more than the potential to reach a certain audience. You canâ??t know how that audience will behave. How many people skip past the ads? How many people leave the room for a snack, to finish the laundry or hit the bathroom? The number of people watching the show isnâ??t the same as the number of people sticking around for the ads.

And we havenâ??t even spoken about the people who arenâ??t interested in what you have to say.

Now, letâ??s define what an impression is. Actually, Iâ??ll let Steven do it for me:

â??Impressions is a term used in online media, describing the number of times an ad is loaded. Loaded in a user’s webbrowser that is. Some people will describe it as showed, defining impressions as the number of times users viewed the ad, but this is false. It’s not because an ad is loaded that the users actually viewed it. He can overlook it, the ad may be invisible on his screen (below the scroll area for example) or he might not view the just loaded page at all (something happening more often as tabbed browsing becomes well spread). However, the term impressions echoes the wish that users at least notice, maybe unconscious, the ads.â?

Reading this definition, it would seem that an Impression has similar issues as the GRP. People may or may not see the ad. It may or may not load. It may or may not be a waste of money.

However, near as I can tell, thatâ??s the point. Online advertising is cheaper than traditional from a cost per thousand standpoint. So that allows you, the advertisers, to try things out. To test, tweak, adjust and try again. Online advertisers also allows you to target an audience at a more micro level. To reach into the cracks, speak to people who are truly engaged and speak to them, in a best case scenario, one on one.

And that, I believe is where television GRPs lose out to Impressions: flexibility. Because your online dollars go further than they do offline.

Other questions:

Related stuff:

â?˘ Actually, just today, Seth Godin offered up a great piece to the online advertising discussion.

â?˘ Add me to the list of people linking to this post: The Devil and Online Marketing.

â?˘ “Digesting Google’s new PPA Advertising Product“, from over at TechCrunch.

2 Responses to “QAD: Advertisers want to know - 4”

  1. Philippe Says:

    Hi Mark,

    As usual, here’s my answer: http://badideaindeed.wordpress.com/2007/04/16/dell-hell-strikes-back/

    I struggled with the question…

  2. Mark Says:

    This one did require more research, that’s for sure. But I found the posts that I pointed to be incredibly valuable.

Leave a Reply

 
 
 
 
ACCAbuzz
English Cut
Kansas Family Law Blog
Lincoln Sign Company
Stonyfield Farm
 
Bad Idea, Indeed
BlogWriteforCEOs
Business 2.0
Church of the Customer
Converstations
David Armano
Gaping Void
Guy Kawasaki
Living Light Bulbs
Malcolm Gladwell
Mark Cuban
MarketingProfs
MIT Advertising Lab
My 2 Cents
Robert Scoble
Springwise
Techno/Marketer
WOMMA
 
Unleashing the Idea Virus
The Cluetrain Manifesto
The Tipping Point
Life After The 30" Spot
Purple Cow
The Big Moo
Naked Conversations
Remembering the Montreal Expos
Age of Conversation
 
Robin Hood Marketing
The Art of the Start
Do It Wrong Quickly
Wikinomics
Age of Conversation
 
Citizen Marketers
Creating Customer Evangelists
The 22 immutable laws of mktg
The Corporate Blogging Book
The New Rules of Marketing + PR
 
CK
Valeria Maltoni
Nedra Weinreich
Mack Collier
Kris Hoet
Gavin Heaton
Tim McHale
Stephen Denny
Jason Moore
Tim Jackson
Nathan Snell
Tammy Strnatka
Jane Lindsey
Bob Glaza
Drew McLellan
Mario Vellandi
Paul McEnany
Kathy Smith
Cam Beck
Jeremy Shearer
Lewis Green
Winnie Anderson
Steve Woodruff
Laura Ries
Claudiu Florea
Doug Hudiburg
Chip + Dan Heath
Ann Handley
Scot Quaranda
Hazel Wagner
C. B. Whittemore
Muskie McKay
Bill Gammell
Gaynelle Grover
Victor Cook
Jay Hamilton-Roth
Steve Akler
David Berkowitz
Krista Goon
Mansing Bhor